Decentralisation and Leadership Styles (AQA Paper 1 2019, Q20) Exam Support What is leadership? It improves overall communication. There is nothing complicated about the autocratic leadership style. What is autocratic leadership and its advantages? They are the managerial equivalent of an emergency room surgeon who is forced to do whatever necessary to save a patients life. However, excess control can also result in low employee morale and employee engagement. Individual decision making: Less competent sub-managers can be used only to carry out the orders of the boss. The leader defines goals and the limitations for action and then leaves the remaining process. There are a number of vital benefits to autocratic leadership, according to the Houston Chronicle. However, they describe the disadvantages of this style as promoting staff defiance, lack of free . outline the advantages of this style, such as increased situational control, discipline over workers, short discussions, and group members knowing their roles and tasks. Autocratic leadership - Definition, Components, Advantage, Disadvantages. There are many qualities that are needed to be a good leader or manager. It also creates hardships for the leader because they may get blamed for the actions of a worker when that worker was told to do something completely different. For employees, an environment where decision-making is solely the managers job can mean a relatively low stress environment. At times, the original instruction may get lost within complex and multiple channels of communication. There is also less feedback from various levels of management which must be processed. An autocratic leader is not wishy-washy or passive aggressive; an autocratic leader makes expectations and the consequences for not meeting them clear from the outset. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a style of leadership characterized by direct, top-down communication and commands. They prefer to set their objectives, plan of action, processes and methods independently. Bad leaders can put a company out of business. Definition and Pros/Cons, Demings 14 Points For Quality Management [Explained], What is Deming Management? Many companies have been forced to completely reset their under-performing teams because the leadership in place formed the identity of everyone involved. This working environment can leave employees feeling suppressed. As in an autocratic organization, a single leader is involved in decision-making, he makes decisions based on his own logic and judgment. If the leader offers questionable ethics, however, and refuses to create fairness, then there is no one who can really hold that person accountable. In . Although this kind of leadership can sound harsh at first, it can be very effective. This allow for a quick turn-around of the issue, helping the company to begin pursuing its mission once again. To be effective, the leader must be able to have proven competencies in their field, as they are responsible for making most of the decisions in the workplace. LS23 6AD Company Reg no: 04489574. More Cautious Definition, Principles, Techniques, and Pros/Cons. Managers are interested in how happy workers feel and in many ways they act as a father figure (pater means father in Latin). * The leaders set rules, and systems for their team members. The leader is the only person to take the decision solely as they are in charge . In addition, the leaders directly communicate to their followers where the work is to be done. The correct leadership approach used at the right time will foster a long-term employeeleader relationship. The correct leadership approach used at the right time will foster a long-term employeeleader relationship. - They don't have group members, they have followers. One of the other notable cons of the autocratic leadership style is that there is a poor relationship between the leader and followers. 7. Workers can benefit from the competencies offered by their leader, replicating productivity by using the leaders knowledge and experience as a workplace asset. The style is closely linked with Mayo's Human Relation view of motivation and also the social needs of Maslow. According to Attner and Plunkett (1994) managers who use the autocratic leadership style do not share decision-making authority with their subordinates. Unlike, group decision-making the autocratic leader does not have to decide with his followers. That means the personal morality of the leader becomes the corporate reality of the business. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages to consider with the autocratic leadership style. Many companies tend to turn to an autocratic leadership style when they need to create short-term results in an urgent way. Autocratic leadership is . Essentially, no one will be confused about the direction of a company or even the specific assignment they are working on. The leader does not have to deal with internal politics or disputes at the decision-making stage. 10. By the time the information reaches the front-line employees doing most of the work, the entire original message could be lost. Autocratic leadership eradicates this confusion as the command goes straight to the people involved. Although creativity, independent thinking, and new processes are included as part of the overall leadership style, their implementation is not a top priority. Leaders are of different types. What is the cons of autocratic leadership? The productivity levels may be higher, but with no say in the process, resentment will quickly build. How Procedures Can Improve Efficiency, available at: https://online.stu.edu/articles/education/autocratic-leadership.aspx (accessed 06 April 2021). An autocratic leader focuses less on collecting input from team members and tends to make executive decisions that others are expected to follow. This ensures that employees are exercising best of their abilities to get the job done, and time and other resources are not wasted. Do you have to be born with the correct qualities or can you be taught to be a good leader? Lindsay Kramer has been a small business owner since 2014. The result is an unhappy workforce. The quality of a team, structure, or organization practicing autocratic leadership is dependent upon the ethics of the leader in charge. In, laissez-faire leadership leader gives all power to his subordinates to act on their own. The leader shares defined roles and patterns of work with the employees. In such organizations, the leader has a small number of tasks to handle and the number of employees is also few. One of the greatest advantages to working with an autocratic leader is that the employee always knows whats expected and what will happen if they fail to perform as expected. They, therefore, make all the strategic decisions without any or extremely little inputs from the people who work under them. 214 High Street, On the other hand, employees are responsible for following instructions and meeting deadlines. Likewise, this style is also very effective when astringent synchronisation of processes is essential to productivity. They may also feel that the leadership does not care about their needs and desires which is unproductive for organisations. The biggest problem is, no one talks about innovation and out-of-the-box ideas in this leadership style. Contrary to popular opinions, many organisations are well suited to the autocratic leadership type at some degree. These environments allow for an error margin of zero. Paternalistic managers give more attention to the social needs and views of their workers. This process may create a powerful and positive impact on their performance. Autocratic leaders generally believe that they are the smartest people around and know more than their subordinates. They wont get blamed if it fails and they wont get credit if it succeeds. ", 100 Best Side Hustles for Teens to Make Money, 10 Proven Psychological Pricing Strategies with Examples, 100 Office Etiquette Rules You Need to Know, 50 Best Business Letter Closings of All-Time. the us american football coach vince lombardi is an example. Leadership is critical in a changing business environment, where small and medi um sized companie s operat e, and even more whe n changes are amplifie d by transformations of a whole economy, like . The advantages and disadvantages of the autocratic leadership style show that it can be effective when an organization requires quick, accurate decisions from an experienced leader. Here are the top advantages of autocratic leadership: This leadership style enables quick decision-making, which is one of the most significant benefits of autocratic leadership. Nevertheless, autocratic leadership is one of the least popular management styles and certainly not suitable for each organisation. Did you know that autocratic leadership is great when it comes to handling crises? This leadership style can produce authoritative short-term results. A team can become so dependent upon the leader that they stop functioning when their directions are no longer present. Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership pdf It would be a great world if everyone could work together cohesively, pushing a business to its desired goal. The free reign approach can prove an effective type of leadership when the team has achieved identity and cohesion, resulting in motivated and resourceful team members. This form serves well when the . She's no stranger to the wild ride that running a business can be, but that doesn't mean she's done learningevery day, it's something different when you're in the driver's seat. Now that weve discussed several advantages of the autocratic leadership style, here come some disadvantages: One of the biggest disadvantages of exercising autocratic leadership is that it can result in low employee morale. To bring in information to the group members. Such leaders usually make decisions based on their own judgment and ideas. Lets take a glimpse at who autocratic leaders are and what they do. Lets take a glimpse at who autocratic leaders are and what they do. The decision can be made faster with this leadership style. Whether this style makes a good leader has been a longstanding debate. It is an easy way to cut through administrative red tape to ensure better communication to all workers. In this kind of leadership mostly leader makes new contacts with outside people. The following are the notable advantages and disadvantages of the autocratic leadership style in the workplace. Working with a supervisor who makes all expectations clear and specifies exactly how to perform tasks can make the process of acclimating to a new work environment much easier for the employee. There are high levels of frustration often found in an autocratic environment, even if workers are inexperienced. Since autocratic leadership ensures clearly defined structures, it clearly states what to do and how to do it. Likewise, as an autocratic leader is not necessarily the same as being a fascist, there are people with certain personalities, who may indeed work well under this type of leadership style (Murphy, 2019). According to St. Thomas University, democratic leadership is defined by mutual respect between the manager and their team members. Quick decision: Quick decision making is guaranteed because a single person decides for the whole group. That makes it almost impossible for leaders to leave the workplace, as workers can become so dependent on their decision-making abilities that nothing gets done if the leader is not present for some reason. It can also mean workers personal needs are neglected, causing them to feel like their supervisor does not care about them as individuals. One of the primary reasons why the autocratic leadership style tends to fail is because it is fully dependent upon the skills and knowledge of the leader. They can easily manage these issues because they're the only ones who get to call the shots. But rarely do employees know that there are several. Here, in the autocratic organization, there are fewer levels which reduces the challenges of poor communication that might be caused because of too many levels. After all, this is what good leadership is all about. Autocratic leaders are like the captain of the ship. Team members have creative freedom 3. These benefits of autocratic leadership can swiftly take the team out of trouble. List of Advantages of Autocracy Government 1. St. Thomas University: What is Autocratic Leadership? After all, this is what good leadership is all about. You may also like reading Advantages and disadvantages of private limited company. Because of the strict method in which employees are micromanaged, there is no room for flexibility within the work environment. Even if the leader is not knowledgeable in the area, they are forced into a position where they must decide. Whether this style makes a good leader has been a longstanding debate. This leadership style doesnt have a specific training forum to attend or require knowledge of a specific theory of leadership. The work culture is based solely on the ethics and morality of the leader, which means a poor working environment is not likely to change. Employees feel motivated and devote their maximum effort when they feel valued for their presence and contribution. They even need guidance and instruction on how to, to do the given jobs. Autocratic (or authoritarian) managers like to make all the important decisions and closely supervise and control workers. To conclude, though autocratic leadership style has several disadvantages, it can be argued that there are some situations autocratic leadership style should yield better results for organisations. The democratic leadership style does solicit for opinions, perspectives, and experiences. As autocratic leaders usually make decisions without consulting their team members, it may cause team members dislike towards the leadership. List of the Advantages of Autocratic Leadership 1.

Bishop Gorman Coaching Staff, Crime In West Covina Today, Back Coupes Up Urban Dictionary, Jennifer Robin Jones Birth Defect, Articles A